Transmitting electronic mail attachment over a network using a e-mail page

ABSTRACT

Transmitting e-mail attachments from a sender of a network to a recipient of the network. According to an embodiment, an attachment is stored in a storage means visible to the network and relatively local to the sender, the attachment having a unique network address. The sender requests an e-mail option from the recipient, which provides a configurable e-mail page to the sender in response to the request. An attachment reference comprising the network address of the attachment is supplied to the configurable e-mail page.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to the transmission of electronic mailover computer networks, and, in particular, to apparatuses and methodfor transmitting e-mail by using a configurable e-mail page of therecipient.

2. Description of the Related Art

In computer network systems such as local-area networks ("LANs"),wide-area networks ("WANs"), and the Internet and the world-wide web("WWW") which operates thereon, electronic mail ("e-mail") systems areoften utilized to facilitate communication between two users of thenetwork. Each user has a unique network address which may be used forrouting and identifying purposes in delivering an e-mail message fromone user (the "sender") to another user (the "recipient") on thenetwork.

Often an e-mail message contains a relatively small amount of text orother forms of data. One or more additional files of data, called"attachments," are often attached to the e-mail message. For example, aword processing file or graphic file that is incompatible with thedisplay capabilities of the e-mail system or that is too large to beconveniently displayed by the e-mail application program may betransmitted from the sender to the recipient by attaching it to ane-mail message. The e-mail message may introduce or explain theattachments attached thereto, for example. Thus, the recipient receivesthe e-mail message plus any attached data files, which may be opened,accessed, or utilized separately from the e-mail message itself.

Such attachments are typically transmitted via the transmission mediumof the network "by value," which means that the actual data of a givenattachment is transmitted along with the primary e-mail message (or anattachment may be transmitted independently, with no accompanying e-mailmessage). One problem with current methods of transmitting e-mailattachments is that, because of the potentially significant size of suchattachments, a large amount of network communications bandwidth can beconsumed in order to transmit such attachments. Costly network resourcesmay also be required as such message and attachments traverse severalnodes or elements of the network on the way from the sender to therecipient node. Additionally, the memory storage devices of local nodesof the network that often store such incoming e-mail messages and theirassociated attached files may be overloaded by many incoming e-mailmessages.

SUMMARY

There is provided herein a method, apparatus, and storage medium fortransmitting e-mail attachments from a sender of a network to arecipient of the network. According to an embodiment of the invention,an attachment is stored in a storage means visible to the network andrelatively local to the sender, the attachment having a unique networkaddress. The sender requests an e-mail option from the recipient, whichprovides a configurable e-mail page to the sender in response to therequest. An attachment reference comprising the network address of theattachment is supplied to the configurable e-mail page.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the presentinvention will become more fully apparent from the followingdescription, appended claims, and accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 shows a networked computer system in accordance with a preferredembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 depicts a second networked computer system in accordance with apreferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a third networked computer system in accordance witha preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates an e-mail message format in accordance with apreferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 shows another computer network in accordance with a preferredembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 shows an HTTP-only e-mail system in accordance with a preferredembodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating the method of operation of thee-mail system of FIG. 6.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

System Hardware

Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown networked computer system 100,in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.Networked computer system 100 comprises a plurality of nodes or personalcomputers ("PCs") 110, 120, 130. Personal computer or node 110 comprisesa processor 116, memory 117, video camera 111, microphone 112, mouse113, speakers 114, and monitor 115. Nodes 110, 120, 130 and other nodesof the network are interconnected via medium 101. Medium 101 may be, forexample, a communication channel such as an Integrated Services DigitalNetwork ("ISDN"). As will be understood, various nodes of a networkedcomputer system may be connected through a variety of communicationmedia, including local area networks ("LANs"), plain-old telephone lines("POTS"), sometimes referred to as public switched telephone networks("PSTN"), and the like. Various nodes of a network may also constitutecomputer system users interconnected via a network such as the Internet.As will be appreciated, each user of a network has a unique address oridentification within the network. As used herein, "user" may beutilized interchangeably with a node of a network. Thus, each user ornode has a particular network address within a given network thatuniquely identifies the user or node. Those skilled in the art willunderstand, however, that this usage is to be distinguished from anactual human user who may also have a unique address, such as an e-mailaddress, that is not related to the network address of any particularnode of the network, since human users can often access e-mail messagesfrom arbitrary nodes within the network. However a human user at a givenpoint in time while using a network uses a particular node having aunique network address as discussed above.

Often a multi-point data conferencing system may be supported by such anetwork, as well as the capability of transmitting e-mail messages fromone user to another. A plurality of multi-point conferencing units("MCUs") may thus be utilized, as will be understood by those skilled inthe art, to transmit data to and from various nodes or "endpoints" ofthe conferencing system. Nodes and/or MCUs may be interconnected via anISDN link or through a local area network ("LAN"), in addition tovarious other communications media such as nodes connected through theinternet. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that nodes of aconferencing system may, in general, be connected directly to thecommunications medium such as a LAN or through an MCU, and that aconferencing system may comprise other nodes or elements such asrouters, servers, and the like.

Processor 116 is preferably a general-purpose programmable processor,such as an Intel® Pentium™ processor. Those skilled in the art will alsoappreciate that processors of nodes of networked computer system 100 mayalso be a special-purpose video processor such as the Intel®82750PB. Aswill be appreciated, the various peripherals and components of a nodesuch as those of node 110 may vary from those of other nodes. Thus, node120 and node 130 may be configured identically to or differently thannode 110, as will also be understood. It will further be understood thata node may be implemented on any suitable computer system in addition topersonal computer systems.

Referring now to FIG. 2, there is shown a second networked computersystem 200, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the presentinvention. System 200 illustrates a network such as LAN 201, which maybe used to interconnect a variety of users that may communicate witheach other, for example with e-mail messages. Attached to LAN 201 are aplurality of users such as PCs 210, 211, 212. A user may also beconnected to the LAN via a server or other means (not shown). As will beappreciated, system 200 comprises other types of nodes or elements, suchas centralized post office server 220 and other routers, servers, andnodes. As will be appreciated, a post office server is a special type ofserver typically having a directory of the users or a subset of users onthe LAN of which the post office server is attached, and serves as arepository of incoming mail for its users. As will be understood bythose skilled in the art, in prior art e-mail techniques, a sending usersuch as PC 210 desiring to send and e-mail message with one or moreattachments to a recipient such as PC 212 transmits the e-mail messageplus attachment to LAN 220 for delivery to PC 212. The message andattachment are stored centrally at post office server 220, which thencommunicates to PC 212 through LAN 201 to inform the user of PC 201 thatit has received e-mail. When the user of PC 212 selects an optionrunning on a local version of an e-mail application program compatiblewith LAN 201, the e-mail message and any selected attachment aretransmitted from centralized post office server 220 to PC 212 across LAN201.

As explained hereinabove, this can lead to bandwidth problems. Forexample, post office 220 may need to store a very large number of e-mailmessages and attachments as various users of the network send e-mailmessages to one another. This utilize substantial amounts of processingbandwidth of post office 220, and also requires communications bandwidthof LAN 201 to transmit such data to and from post office server 220. Aswill be appreciated, a plurality of LANs such as system 200, or othernetworks or users, may be further interconnected via other network linkssuch as WAN links. For instance, post office 220 may send and receivemessages to and from its own users such as PCs 210, 211, 212 to otherparticular users interfaced to another post officer server of anotherLAN (not shown). Such a linking of LANs through WAN or other links isillustrated in the exemplary system of FIG. 3.

Referring now to FIG. 3, there is illustrated a third networked computersystem 300, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the presentinvention. System 300 illustrates a WWW system having communicationsacross a backbone communications network such as Internet 301, which maybe used to interconnect a variety of users that may communicate witheach other, for example with e-mail messages. As will be appreciated,the WWW is a set of protocols operating on top of the Internet, andallows a graphical interface system to operate thereon for accessinginformation through the Internet. Attached to Internet 301 in the WWWare a plurality of users such as PCs 317, 318, 327. Typically, a user isinterfaced to other nodes of the WWW through a WWW hyper text transportprotocol ("HTTP") server such as servers 310, 320. As will beunderstood, the WWW is a distributed type of application, characterizedby the WWW HTTP, the WWW's protocol, which runs on top of the Internet'stransmission control protocol/Internet protocol ("TCP/IP"). As will alsobe understood, the WWW may thus be characterized by a set of protocols(i.e., HTTP) running on the Internet as its "backbone." A web browser isan application of a user of a network that, in WWW-compatible typenetwork systems, allows users to view such information and thus allowsthe user to search graphical and text-based files that are linkedtogether using "hypertext" links that are embedded in documents or filesavailable from servers on the network that understand HTTP. As will beunderstood, when a given "web page" is retrieved by a user from anothersource across the Internet, the document retrieved may have varioushypertext links embedded therein and a local copy of the page is createdlocal to the user. Thus, when a user clicks on a hypertext link, thelocally-stored information related to the selected hypertext link istypically sufficient to allow the user's machine to open a connectionacross the Internet to the server indicated by the hypertext link.

As will further be appreciated, more than one user may be coupled toeach HTTP server, for example through a LAN such as LAN 315 asillustrated with respect to WWW HTTP server 310. As will further beappreciated, system 300 comprises other types of nodes or elements. Aswill be understood by those skilled in the art, in prior art e-mailtechniques, a sending user of a network desiring to send an e-mailmessage with one or more attachments to a recipient on the networktransmits the e-mail message plus attachment across the network (forexample, a network such as Internet 301) through various links and nodesof the network until it reaches the recipient user.

As will be appreciated, a WWW HTTP server is an application running on amachine, such as a PC. Thus, each user may be considered to have aunique "server," as illustrated with respect to PC 327. Alternatively, a"server" may be considered to be a server such as WWW HTTP server 310which provides access to the network for a LAN or plurality of nodes orplurality of LANs.

E-Mail Attachments by Reference

One problem with automatically attaching attachments by value is thatmany attachments are never read, viewed, or otherwise utilized by therecipient of the e-mail. Thus, the storage, processing bandwidth, andcommunications bandwidth resources utilized to transmit the attachmentto the recipient are often used inefficiently. In networks such asnetworked computer system 200, this can lead to inefficient use of thestorage and processing bandwidth of any centralized post office and ofthe communications bandwidth of the network. In networks such ascomputer system 300, again the interconnection network 301 may beutilized inefficiently as messages are transmitted that are never usedby the recipient, needlessly consuming processing and communicationsresources. Therefore, in the e-mail system files are attached byreference instead of by value, as described in further detailhereinbelow.

Referring now to FIG. 4, there is illustrated an e-mail message format400 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.In the e-mail message format 400 of the present invention, when a usersuch as PC 210 of FIG. 2 wishes to send an attachment with an emailmessage to a user such as PC 212, the e-mail message 401 is transmittedalong with a relatively small attachment reference 402, instead ofactually transmitting the entire attachment file along with e-mailmessage 401 as is done in prior art e-mail systems. Thus, instead oftransmitting the attachment by value, the attachment is transmitted "byreference." As will be appreciated, attachment reference 402 comprises apointer 410 that points to the actual location of the attachment 420. Ina preferred embodiment, this location of the attachment 420 is typicallya storage medium relatively local to the sending user so that fewernetwork resources are utilized in transmitting and storing theattachment, especially if a recipient does not actually require theattachment.

Thus, the attachment 402 is stored "locally" to the sending user, whichmeans that the attachment need not be transmitted across as many networklinks and elements as would be needed to reach the recipient user. Tostore attachment 420 locally in a system using at least one centralizedpost office, such as system 200, the attachment is stored on PC 210itself. PC 210 must thus be "visible" to LAN 201, so that a recipientsuch as PC 212 may retrieve attachment 420, when desired, from PC 210via LAN 201 using attachment reference 402.

An attachment or e-mail may be distributed to multiple users as well.For example, e-mail message 401 is transmitted by PC 210 via LAN 201 toPC 212 and PC 211. As will be appreciated, e-mail message 401 may betemporarily stored in centralized post office server 220 before beingfurther transmitted to PCs 211 and 212 via LAN 201. If the user of PC210 also wishes to attach an attachment 420, then this attachment 420and e-mail message 401 are created, but attachment 420 is nottransmitted to either post office 220 or to PCs 211 or 212 via LAN 201.Rather, at this point attachment 420 is stored in PC 210 itself, or inan associated or connected memory storage means, and attachmentreference 402 is created to be transmitted as an attachment with e-mailprimary message 401 to recipient PCs 211, 212. As will be appreciated,depending upon the configuration of the e-mail system applicable to LAN201 and its user nodes, e-mail message 301 and its attachment reference302 will be transmitted to recipient PCs 211 and 212 in the standardmanner, e.g. either directly, across LAN 201, or through theintermediary node of post office 220.

If the user of any recipient PC 211 or 212 desires to access theattachment, the attachment reference 402 will enable the local recipientPC to retrieve the attachment 420 directly over LAN 201 from where it isstored in PC 210. In a preferred embodiment, this retrieval ofattachment 420 does not need to go through post office 220.

To store attachment 420 locally in a system where users interface to anetwork via local servers, such as in system 300, attachment 420 isstored in the local WWW HTTP server, as illustrated in FIG. 4. Forinstance, if PC 327 desires to transmit e-mail primary message 401 andattachment 420 to PC 317, then attachment 420 is stored in a file serverof WWW HTTP server 320, which is "visible" to the WWW over the Internet301, and attachment reference 402 is generated which comprises a uniformresource locator ("URL") pointer to the location of attachment 420within WWW HTTP server 320. E-mail primary message 401 with attachedattachment reference 402 are then transmitted to recipient PC 317 acrossInternet 301 in the standard manner, and PC 317 may the use attachmentreference 402 to access attachment 420 when desired.

In this manner, network bandwidth and resources are utilized moreefficiently as there is no need to actually transmit the attachment 420over the network unless a recipient of the corresponding e-mail message401 is interested in viewing or otherwise using attachment 420.

In a preferred embodiment, attachment references are relatively smalland approximately constant in size, for example on the order of 100 to200 bytes. The actual attachment such as attachment 420 of e-mail format400 is stored in a file storage means that is coupled to LAN 201 andthat is visible to any server or user coupled to LAN 201, so that anyrecipient user's PC may retrieve attachment 420 if desired. Connectingto a node that is "visible" to the network is also sometimes referred toas opening a socket to the node. As will be understood by those skilledin the art, an attachment reference 402 comprises a file referencesuitable for locating attachment 420. For example, with LAN 201 servingas a network under a WWW-compatible networking standard (for example,using the WWW's TCP/IP and WWW HTTP), attachment reference 402 comprisesa WWW-type file reference, referred to as a uniform resource locator("URL") that refers, or points, to the actual attachment file 420. Aswill be understood, attachment reference 402 is either a logical pointeror logical path that indicates either where the attachment, or a copy ofit, resides. As will further be appreciated by those skilled in the art,a URL is a logical path used in the WWW HTTP. Attachment reference 420may also comprise information that indicates what options were used toproduce the stored attachment file 420, for example whether and/or howthe attachment file 420 is compressed or encrypted.

As will also be appreciated, attachment 420 may be compressed (tominimize storage space and network bandwidth consumed) and/or encrypted(for privacy) before storing in WWW HTTP server 221 or before beingtransmitted from WWW HTTP server 221 to a recipient PC's respective WWWHTTP server. When e-mail message 401 and attachment reference 402 arereceived by a user of the network such as the user of PC 212, anapplication program running on PC 212 is able to retrieve attachment 420using attachment reference 402. As will be understood, this retrievalmay be made transparent to the user of PC 212. For instance, the user ofPC 212 may be informed by PC 212 that a file 420 is "attached" to arecently-received e-mail message 401. If the user decides to view,launch, copy or otherwise utilize attachment 420, then PC 212 reads acopy of attachment 420 from WWW HTTP server 221, decompresses anddecrypts attachment 420 as necessary, creates a local copy of attachment420 just as if attachment 420 had originally been attached by value toe-mail message 401, and launches the appropriate applicationcorresponding to the file type of attachment 420 (for example, agraphical viewer program may be launched to allow the viewing ofattachment 420 if attachment 420 is a graphics file). As will beappreciated, in general a sender such as PC 210 must have access to somenetwork server so that it is able to store the attachment file 420 in adirectory on the network server, where the directory in which theattachment 420 is stored is visible to the network via the networkserver so that the attachment file 420 is accessible by recipient usersof the network.

Alternatively, instead of the retrieval of attachment 420 being madetransparent to the user of PC 212, the user may be given the option toview information about the remotely-stored attachment 420 beforedeciding to fetch this attachment. Additionally, as will be appreciated,an attachment may in alternative preferred embodiments be automaticallydeleted after being accessed by the recipient or by all of therecipients, where multiple recipients receive the e-mail message; orafter a given time limit, such as 90 days. As will also be understood,one additional advantage of the present attachment by referenceinvention is that the locally-stored attachment may in some embodimentsbe updated if necessary, in some cases before a recipient has decided toread the attachment. Thus, although an attachment is distributed at aparticular time before subsequent changes are made, at least someintended recipients may get a more up-to-date copy of the attachmentwhen they finally decide to read the e-mail attachment.

Because the attachment file is stored on a WWW HTTP server or otherwisein a memory storage means local to the sending user but visible to otherusers of the network, it may be desirable to ensure that unauthorizedWWW users browsing the WWW HTTP server are unable to obtain a usablecopy of the attachment file. One method for accomplishing such securityis to store attachment 420 in encrypted form. The encryption key istransmitted with the original e-mail message 401 (e.g., stored withine-mail primary message 401, within attachment reference 402, or attachedas a separate decryption key attachment to e-mail primary message 401 orto attachment reference 402). Thus, an unauthorized user is unable todecipher the actual contents of attachment file 420, while a recipientof e-mail message 401, for whom access to attachment 420 is intended,will be able to access attachment 420 since e-mail message 401 isaccompanied by the corresponding decryption key. As will be appreciated,other encryption techniques may be utilized as well for these andrelated purposes, such as public/private key techniques that also allowattachments to be digitally signed for authentication purposes and toverify the attachment's integrity.

As will be understood, in alternative preferred embodiments of thepresent invention, a plurality of file attachments may be attached to ane-mail message in accordance with the present invention. In this case acorresponding plurality of attachment references may be attached to thee-mail message for independent access by a recipient of any or all ofthe attachment files. In further alternative preferred embodiments, anattachment reference may be transmitted to a recipient withoutaccompanying an e-mail message, so that, effectively, an e-mail messageitself comprises the attachment reference.

E-Mail System Filter for Attachment by Reference or by Value

There is also provided herein a system and method by which an e-mailsystem can decide whether to attach an attachment to an e-mail messageby reference or by value. As will be appreciated, in some situations ause of automatic attachment by reference of each attachment to eache-mail message transmitted may tend to increase the load on the network.In the present e-mail system it is determined whether to distribute agiven attachment by reference or by value by establishing a cost figure,as explained in more detail hereinbelow. Referring now to FIG. 5, thereis illustrated another computer network 500, in accordance with apreferred embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated, network500 comprises a plurality of LANs such as LANs 501, 530, 540. LAN 501interconnects a plurality of local users such as sending user 502 andrecipient user 503. The lines radiating from each LAN represent subnetssuch as subnet 506 which connect a subset of the LAN's users to the LAN.Different LANs are typically connected to each other via WAN links suchas WAN link 520. Some LANs may also be intercoupled via coupled subnets,as illustrated with respect to the coupling of subnet 536 of LAN 530with subnet 546 of LAN 540 at junction 550. For purposes of transmittinge-mail messages and attachments to and from users on different LANs,post office servers such as post officer servers 505 and 535 areutilized to interface via the WAN link, as illustrated in FIG. 5. Aswill be appreciated, on some LANs more than one post office may beutilized to handle a subset of the users of the LAN. Thus, a sender 502may transmit e-mail to a recipient 503 on the same LAN by utilizing theservices of LAN 501 and post office 505, as will be appreciated by thoseskilled in the art and as further described hereinabove.

However, often a user such as sender 502 wishes to send e-mail to arecipient such as recipient user 532, which is a member of another LAN.When this is to be performed, typically an e-mail message is transmittedfrom sender 502 through subnet 506 to LAN 501, and therethrough to postoffice 505. Post office 505 then further transmits the e-mail messagevia WAN 520 to post office 535, which then delivers the e-mail torecipient 532 via its respective subnet 538. Alternatively, if each postoffice 505, 535 operates in centralized fashion so that it stores thecontents of e-mail messages that are read by local users of therespective LAN, the primary traffic may be between post offices and overWANs, rather than to or from the individual users via their local LANs.As will be appreciated, WAN 520 may comprise a distributed network suchas the Internet, or other medium of communication. Thus, several LANsand post offices may need to be traversed before an e-mail messagereaches its ultimate destination LAN and user.

In the e-mail system filter of the present invention, post offices ofthe network system can convert a file attachment by value to a fileattachment by reference, and vice-versa. As will be appreciated,attachment by reference is useful for reducing network bandwidthconsumption where the available bandwidth in the network is restricted,for example on costly links of the network such as the WAN T-1 linkscommonly used as part of corporate data network backbones between sites.For instance, WAN link 520 of FIG. 5 may comprise such a WAN T-1 link.However, some LANs or post offices are interconnected via high-speed,relatively low-cost methods such as the intercoupling of subnets, suchas described hereinabove with respect to LANs 530, 540. Where networktraffic would clog the WAN link or other restricted bandwidth link ofthe network, limiting the number of copies that cross the link isimportant. As described hereinabove, utilizing attachment by referencecan be useful in addressing this problem.

As will be appreciated, in a system in which attachment by value isutilized, if all relevant users are within a single high-bandwidthnetwork or LAN, then the costs associated with attaching files by valueto e-mail messages are dominated by the memory costs of keeping separatecopies of attachments for each recipient of the attachment. If thenetwork is bandwidth limited, then such costs are dominated by the costsof network delay. However, the method of attachment by reference can beaccompanied by the same problem as attachment by value if too manyrecipients of an e-mail message are across a costly link in the network.As will be understood, in the limiting case where every recipientdecides to look at or otherwise access, retrieve, or utilize anattachment file which is attached by reference, then the method ofattachment by reference can degenerate into the worst case of attachmentby value, since a separate copy of the attachment must traverse thecostly link in the network for each recipient. (However, as will beunderstood, the frequency of such worst case results may be minimized ifcaching proxy servers are utilized, where, for example, a server of thenetwork closer in terms of cost to a recipient retains for a certaintime a copy of the attachment when it passes the attachment to arecipient of the e-mail message, so that the copy may in some instancesbe sent to a subsequent recipient that requests the attachment withoutthe attachment needing to be retrieved from its original storagelocation, which is further in terms of cost than its temporary cachedlocation.) For example, if ten users coupled to LAN 530 were to belisted as a recipient of an e-mail message sent by sender 502, if eachsuch recipient accesses the attachment that is attached by reference,then ten retrievals of the attachment would have to be made across WANlink 520. In this case it may have been cheaper computationally andcommunications-wise to have transmitted the entire e-mail withattachment by value to post office 535, whereupon post office 535 maymore efficiently distribute the e-mail and attachment to all ten localrecipients, since only one use of WAN link 520 would have been requiredto transmit the relatively large e-mail attachment.

This problem may be addressed when using an attachment-by-referencee-mail system by copying the attachment to a location in the networkwhere it is likely that fetching the attachment will cost less. Ingeneral, this location is referred to in the present application as afile-replication point, such as a post office. For example, when anattachment reference that accompanies an e-mail message crosses a WANlink such as WAN link 520, the post office at the receiving side of theWAN link (post office 535, for example) automatically creates a copy ofthe attachment at the receiving post office by retrieving the attachmentfrom its location as pointed to by the attachment reference. Thereceiving post office also changes all attachment references to point tothe newly-created copy that is maintained by the receiving post office.As described above, this may be distributed as necessary to localrecipients without engaging high communications medium costs. If furtherWAN links or post offices remain to be traveled through by the e-mailmessage before reaching a recipient, each subsequent post office maymake further copies of an attachment and change the attachment referenceas required to point to the latest storage location of the copy of theattachment file, or may leave the attachment reference untouched as thecase ordains.

At a particular file replication point of the network which has receivedan attachment reference which is on its way through the network from asender to one or more recipients, the file replication point will, inaccordance with the present invention, either leave the attachmentreference alone so that it continues to point to the nearest previouslocation of the attachment, or will replicate a copy of the attachmentlocally and update the attachment reference accordingly, i.e. so thatthe attachment reference now points to the local copy of the attachment.In general, the method of the present invention attempts to minimizeoverall network costs when a particular file replication point makesthis determination. This may be done by estimating the costs that willbe borne by the network if the reference is unchanged, and by estimatingthe costs if the attachment is copied locally and the reference updated,and by the file replication point updating the attachment referenceaccordingly, i.e. by leaving it unchanged if costs would be minimizedthereby, or by updating it if this can be expected to lower overallcosts.

As will be appreciated, various techniques may be utilized and factorsconsidered in estimating such costs. Ideally, the communication costs ofvarious WAN and LAN segments that would be crossed by attachmentretrievals, local storage costs, and related costs are taken intoaccount. The size of the file attachment is also taken into account, assome of these costs vary in accordance therewith. Additionally, anestimate of the group of recipients that are expected to actuallyretrieve the attachment can further refine the cost estimate, since theaccuracy of such cost estimates may be improved if it is known inadvance the likelihood of actual attachment retrieval by the recipients,or by certain classes or subsets of recipients or by individualrecipients. For instance, if it is known or expected that a particularattachment will very likely be read by most or all recipients, the costsassociated with updating the attachment reference at file replicationpoints closer and closer to the ultimate recipients will tend to belower than the cost of leaving the original attachment reference (andattachment location) unchanged, since very many attachment retrievesover a larger portion of the network would be required when theattachment is read by a large number of the recipients. Conversely, ifzero or a small number of recipients are expected to read theattachment, it will tend to cost less to leave the attachment referenceunchanged.

Thus, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention the cost ofattachment file transport and of attachment file storage is, however,estimated. Generally, the expected cost of recipients retrieving anattachment may be estimated by summing the cost for the attachment tocross each LAN segment and each WAN link or segment on its way to therecipient, and the cost of any storage along the route. Storage costs,as will be understood, include the preservation cost associated with theactual storage medium, such as a hard drive, and processing costassociated with the computations required to move the attachment in andout of the storage medium. Also, storage costs outside the network, suchas at a user's machine, will be different from storage costs inside thee-mail system. For example, if the e-mail system is short on the amountof hard disk space, then such costs should increase, to provide a pushor "incentive" to use relatively more of the user's resources forstorage purposes. Similarly, if traffic across a particular WAN linkbecomes heavy, the e-mail system of the present invention will increasethe cost of the WAN segment, resulting in more resort to attachmentreplication and attachment reference substitution so that traffic overthe WAN link is reduced.

As will be understood, in the present invention cost estimates ingeneral may be performed, which range in accuracy, sophistication, andnumber of factors considered. In a preferred embodiment, for instance, arelatively simple type of cost estimate may be utilized. As statedabove, normally the size of the attachment is one factor that should beconsidered. As attachment files are typically fairly large, however, ina preferred embodiment attachment size is presumed to be large and isthus ignored. In a preferred embodiment, transportation costs only, andnot storage costs, are taken into account in a preferred cost estimatemethod of the present invention.

For the following formula, the following definitions are utilized:

Audience: number of intended recipients of an attachment file

Readers: number of intended recipients who actually read the attachment(necessarily less than or equal to Audience)

Segment: a LAN subnet

Transversals: number of Segments required to be crossed to move amessage to another Segment

Segment Cost: a cost associated with crossing a given Segment

The function ∩ is defined as the function that gives the number ofcommon users between two elements. For example, Readers ∩ Segment givesthe number of users on a network segment who read the attachment (where"read" is understood to encompass any form of utilization of anattachment, including viewing, reading, watching, saving, and the like,which would require retrieval of the attachment to allow the recipientto read the attachment). Thus,

Cost=Σ {(Audience/(Readers +1))∩Segment}* (Transversals ∩ Segment) *Segment Cost!

The term (Audience/(Readers +1)), as will be understood, is anefficiency factor to account for the actual readership of theattachment. However, at the time the corresponding e-mail message istransmitted, this factor must be estimated by the e-mail system since itwill not be known a priori how many users of the audience will actuallyread the attachment file. As will be appreciated, the estimate may bebased, for example, on the particular history of recipient interest inmessages sent by a particular user.

The preferred e-mail method of the present invention may be applied toan individual user of a network sending e-mail to other single users, orto groups of recipients. For example, messages between a companypresident and the immediate corporate staff are very likely to be readcompletely, including the attachments. In this case, the e-mail systemwould minimize the message cost by either attaching by reference or byvalue at particular nodes within the network. In another example, anengineer may send out a weekly status report to dozens of recipients,most of whom are nearby (in terms of network costs) and most of whomwill not read the attachment, so that costs are lowered by increased useof attachment by reference. Additionally, as network usage is dynamic,Cost changes with time due to past usage patterns. Thus, temporalfiltering of Cost may also be used to improve e-mail system performance,as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.

The following example is provided to illustrate the filtering method ofthe present invention. Suppose the following costs, LAN: 1; WAN: 10; andthe following distribution of recipients:

    ______________________________________                                        Number of Recipients                                                                         LAN Segments                                                                             WAN Segments                                        ______________________________________                                        3              1          0                                                   4              3          1                                                   3              6          2                                                   ______________________________________                                    

Thus, in the current example, 1 recipients of the e-mail message require1 LAN segment and 0 WAN segments to be crossed, and so forth. With theseparameters, if every recipient were sent a separate copy of the message(or conversely, the recipients used a fetch-by-URL copy of theattachment that is attached by reference), the total Cost would be(3*1)+((4*3)+(4*1*10))+((3*6)+(3*2*10))=3 +52+78=133.

This cost may be further reduced by sending a single copy of theattachment over any WAN links and allowing a post office or otherfile-replication point at the other end of the WAN link to distributethe requisite number of copies further. Thus, using a post office orother file-replication point in this manner, if every recipient readsthe attachment, Cost is (3*1)+((4*3) +10)+((3*6)+(2*10))=3+22+38=63. Aswill be understood, this exemplary calculation is based on pessimisticassumptions assuming that the maximum number of WAN and LAN segments arecrossed despite file replication points being utilized. Thus, in theprevious calculation, one "10" cost is assumed for the second (i.e.,"(4*3)") group of recipients, and two "10" costs (2*10) are assumed forthe two WAN segments associated with the third group of recipients, eventhough redundancy or shared paths between the second and third groups ofrecipients might reduce this cost estimate in other circumstances, aswill be understood.

However, the cost computed here should also be compared to the situationwhere only some percentage of the audience reads the attachment. In thefollowing example, the parameters are identical to the above exampleexcept additional information concerning the number of readers is given(or estimated) as follows:

    ______________________________________                                        Number of                                                                     Recipients                                                                             Number of Readers                                                                          LAN Segments                                                                             WAN Segments                                 ______________________________________                                        3        2            1          0                                            4        2            3          1                                            3        2            6          2                                            ______________________________________                                    

With this information, if each recipient receives an attachment byreference and a subset of the recipients (the readers) read theattachment (by utilizing fetch-by-URL), Cost is (2*1)+((2*3)+(2*1*10))+((2*6)+(2*2*10))=2 +26+52=80. However, if a file-replicationpoint is used at the WAN node as described above, the cost is(2*1)+((2*3)+(1*10))+((2*6)+(2*10))=2+16+32=50, again with pessimisticassumptions as explained above.

HTTP-Only E-Mail System

As explained above, typically, a user is interfaced to other nodes orusers of the WWW through a WWW hyper text transport protocol ("HTTP")server such as servers 310, 320 of FIG. 3. As will be understood, theWWW is a distributed type of application, characterized by the WWW HTTP,the WWW's protocol, which runs on top of the Internet's transmissioncontrol protocol/Internet protocol ("TCP/IP"). The WWW may thus becharacterized by a set of protocols (i.e., HTTP) running on the Internetas its "backbone." A web browser is an application of a user of anetwork that, in WWW-compatible type network systems, allows the user toaccess servers on the network that understand HTTP. For instance, oneuser may use its web browser to access the "home page" or web site ofanother user on the WWW. Various hypertext links are typically availableto allow access of further files or web sites.

Current e-mail system are based on a two-level system: in aclient/server relationship between the user's machine and the user'selectronic post office, and (2) a peer system for moving e-mail betweenpost offices, e.g. over a WAN as described hereinabove with reference toFIGS. 2, 3, and 5. In current e-mail systems compatible with WWW-typesystems, e-mail and web browser functions are combined as independentapplets (i.e., relatively small applications) in so-called compoundsystems. However, compound systems are often more difficult to maintainand for users to comprehend, in addition to other disadvantages. Thus,there is provided herein an HTTP-only e-mail system which provides fore-mail services utilizing only HTTP, with no necessity of accessing aseparate e-mail application in addition to the HTTP web-browser beingutilized.

Referring now to FIG. 6, there is shown an HTTP-only e-mail system 600in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In apreferred embodiment, a potential recipient user 622 of a network suchas the WWW running on the Internet 601 as a backbone, first sets up areserved hyper-text markup language ("HTML") page 625 on his personalserver 620. As will be understood, HTML commands are sent by hostmachines (such as the recipient's machine 622, in this example) tobrowsing users' web browsers to instruct the web browser how to displayinformation, such as text, graphics, and available hypertext links. Thefunction of this page 625 is to allow visitors (i.e., other usersbrowsing the recipient's home page, such as sender 612) to modify thepage's contents by writing an URL (to refer back to the location of ane-mail message, attachment 611, or other location) and a subject ordescription line or other message. Sender 612 may use a typical webbrowser to view recipient 622's "mail page. " By accessing anappropriate hypertext link available on the recipient's mail page (suchas a hypertext link allowing a browser to "leave an e-mail message"), aprocess is caused to be executed on the recipient's machine, which istypically a common gateway interface ("CGI") script. As will beappreciated, a CGI script allows a browsing user 612 to tell therecipient's server 620 to do something different than usual, such asreturning an HTML form 625. This CGI script returns HTML form 625 to thesender, which asks for the URL 627 and the subject or primary message626 (if any) of the e-mail. As will be appreciated, the URL 627 thatshould be incorporated into or attached to the e-mail message 626 may beautomatically entered by sender 612's machine in a process invisible tosender 612, or may be entered by the sender 612 himself. If accepted,the URL 627 and a corresponding hypertext link (which allows therecipient to read the attachment pointed to with pointer 630 by thecurl) are incorporated onto the recipient's mail page, stored at server620. Therefore, at a later time, the recipient 622 can view the incomingmail page and retrieve messages, including message 626 and attachment611, if desired, as attachment 611 is stored locally to sender 612 atserver 610 but visible to users of Internet 601 such as recipient 622.

As will be understood, the URL 627 which is sent as the message pointermay be either simple or very complex. For example, it may be as simpleas a particular attachment file which may be retrieved, such as a textfile or spreadsheet. Alternatively, the URL may instead be a pointer toan HTML document itself at another location accessible by or visible tousers of the WWW. As will be appreciated, an advantage of using suchcomplex URLs is that an "attachment" may be contextually included in thebody of an e-mail message, rather than merely attached as an availablefile for viewing with less context. For instance, the subject or longere-mail primary message may be left, having a hypertext link based on theURL to a spreadsheet. The words "our financial analysis" could beincorporated as a hypertext link into the subject line or into a longertext e-mail message left on the recipient's mail page. Then, instead ofreading the text and then opening the attached spreadsheet (with someconcomitant loss of context), as in current e-mail systems, the usercould click on the reference itself while reading the message, thusimproving the textual reference.

Referring now to FIG. 7, there is shown a flow chart 700 illustratingthe method of operation of e-mail system 600 of FIG. 6. As illustratedin step 701, sender 612 browses via a web browser on a home page orother web site of recipient 622 that is visible to Internet 601. Uponthe sender's selecting a "send e-mail" option (step 701) available onrecipient 622's home page, WWW HTTP server 620 provides HTML page 625(step 702). The sender 612 at this point has already stored anattachment 611 locally (step 703) or at any event must store attachment610 locally before completing the transmission of the HTTP-only e-mail.As will be understood, the locally-stored attachment 610 must be visibleto users of the interconnecting network so that recipient 622, throughits WWW HTTP server 620, will be able to retrieve attachment 611 ifrecipient 622 chooses to read or otherwise access the attachment. Sender612 then supplies any message 626 and URL pointer 627 in HTML page 625(step 704). The message and URL hypertext link are added to therecipient's mail page (step 705). When and if recipient 622 decides toread the attachment 611 (step 706), for example by clicking on ahypertext link embedded message 626, where the hypertext incorporatesURL 627, attachment 611 is retrieved by recipient 622, using its server620, URL 627, and Internet 601 (step 707).

As will be appreciated, in alternative preferred embodiments e-mailsystem 600 may employ encryption and/or compression techniques such asdiscussed above with regard to e-mail message format 400 of FIG. 4 sothat fewer network resources are required to transmit (compressed)attachment 611 if and when it is retrieved by the recipient, and,attachment 611 being visible to users of Internet 601, so that theattachment is encrypted to prevent unauthorized users of the WWW toaccess the attachment.

As will be understood, the present invention can be embodied in the formof computer implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing thoseprocesses. The present invention can also be embodied in the form ofcomputer program code embodied in tangible media, such as floppydiskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other computer-readable storagemedium, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into andexecuted by a computer or by a distributed network of computers, thecomputer or network becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention.The present invention can also be embodied in the form of computerprogram code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loadedinto and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over sometransmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, throughfiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when thecomputer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, thecomputer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. Whenimplemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the computer programcode segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logiccircuits.

It will be understood that various changes in the details, materials,and arrangements of the parts which have been described and illustratedabove in order to explain the nature of this invention may be made bythose skilled in the art without departing from the principle and scopeof the invention as recited in the following claims.

what is claimed is:
 1. A method for transmitting e-mail attachments froma sender of a network to a recipient of the network, the methodcomprising the steps of:(a) storing an attachment in a storage meansvisible to the network and relatively local to the sender, theattachment having a unique network address; (b) requesting, with thesender, an e-mail page from the recipient, the e-mail page being adaptedto receive a text message and an attachment reference comprising thenetwork address of the attachment; (c) providing the e-mail page to thesender in response to the request; and (d) adding, with the sender, theattachment reference and the message to the e-mail page.
 2. The methodof claim 1, wherein the attachment reference comprises a uniformresource locator.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the storage means isa network server.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein:the sender comprisesa sender server for interfacing with the network; the recipientcomprises a recipient server for interfacing with the network; and thee-mail page is a hyper-text markup language (HTML) form.
 5. The methodof claim 1, further comprising the step of:(d) retrieving with therecipient the attachment from the storage means when the recipientchooses to access the attachment.
 6. An apparatus for transmittinge-mail attachments from a sender of a network to a recipient of thenetwork, the apparatus comprising:(a) a storage means for storing anattachment relatively local to the sender, wherein the storage means isvisible to the network, the attachment having a unique network address;(b) means for requesting an e-mail page from the recipient, the e-mailpage being adapted to receive a text message and an attachment referencecomprising the network address of the attachment; (c) means forreceiving the e-mail page from the recipient via the network in responseto the request; and (d) means for adding the attachment reference andthe message to the e-mail page.
 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein theattachment reference comprises a uniform resource locator.
 8. Theapparatus of claim 6, wherein the storage means is a network server. 9.The apparatus of claim 6, wherein:the sender comprises a sender serverfor interfacing with the network; the recipient comprises a recipientserver for interfacing with the network; and the e-mail page is an HTMLform.
 10. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the recipient comprisesmeans for retrieving the attachment from the storage means when therecipient chooses to access the attachment.
 11. A storage medium encodedwith machine-readable computer program code for transmitting e-mailattachments from a sender of a network to a recipient of the network,the storage medium comprising:(a) means for causing the sender to storean attachment relatively local to the sender in a storage means visibleto the network, the attachment having a unique network address; (b)means for causing the sender to request an e-mail page from therecipient, the e-mail page being adapted to receive a text message andan attachment reference comprising the network address of theattachment; (c) means for causing the sender to receive the e-mail pagefrom the recipient via the network in response to the request; and (d)means for causing the sender to add the attachment reference and themessage to the e-mail page.
 12. The storage medium of claim 11, whereinthe attachment reference comprises a uniform resource locator.
 13. Thestorage medium of claim 11, wherein the storage means is a networkserver.
 14. The storage medium of claim 11, wherein:the sender comprisesa sender server for interfacing with the network; the recipientcomprises a recipient server for interfacing with the network; and thee-mail page is an HTML form.
 15. The storage medium of claim 11, whereinthe recipient comprises means for retrieving the attachment from thestorage means when the recipient chooses to access the attachment. 16.An apparatus for transmitting e-mail attachments over a network, theapparatus comprising:(a) a storage device visible to the network andrelatively local to a sender of the network; and (b) a network serverinterfacing the sender with the network; wherein:the storage devicestores an attachment relatively local to the sender; the attachment hasa unique network address; the sender receives an e-mail page from arecipient via the network in response to a request by the sender for thee-mail page, the e-mail page being adapted to receive a text message andan attachment reference comprising the network address of theattachment; and the sender adds the attachment reference and the messageto the e-mail page.
 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein theattachment reference comprises a uniform resource locator.
 18. Theapparatus of claim 16, wherein:the recipient comprises a recipientserver for interfacing with the network; and the e-mail page is an HTMLform.
 19. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the recipient retrieves theattachment from the storage device when the recipient chooses to accessthe attachment.